GMAT : Analysis of An Argument
31. The following appeared as part of the business plan of an investment and financial consulting firm.
Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker's consumption of coffee increases with age from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consumption remains high. The average cola drinker's consumption of cola, however, declines with increasing age. Both of these trends have remained stable for the past 40 years. Given that the number of older adults will significantly increase as the population ages over the next 20 years, it follows that the demand for coffee will increase and the demand for cola will decrease during this period. We should, therefore, consider transferring our investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underline the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate in conclusion.
In this argument the consulting firm recommends the transfer of investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee because, during the next 20 years, coffee demand will increase while Cola demand will decrease.
This prediction is based on the expectation that the number of older adults will significantly increase over the next 20 years. It also cites statistics, reportedly stable for the past 40 years, indicating that coffee consumption increases with age while Cola consumption declines with increasing age.
For three reasons, this financial advice may not be sound.
First, the argument assumes that relative supply conditions will remain unchanged over the next twenty years. However, the supply and cost of cola and coffee beans as well as other costs of doing business as a producer of coffee or cola may fluctuate greatly over a long time period. These factors may affect comparative prices of coffee and cola which in turn may affect comparative demand and the value of investments in coffee and cola companies. Without considering other factors that contribute to the value of a coffee or cola company the firm cannot justify its recommendation solely on the basis of the grounds that it has advanced.
Secondly, the argument fails to account for the timing of the increase in coffee consumption. Perhaps the population will age dramatically during the next five years and then remain relatively flat over the following 15 years. Or perhaps most of the increase in average age will occur toward the end of the 20-year period. An investor has more opportunity to profit over the short and long term in the first scenario than in the second, assuming that the investor can switch investments at a later date. If the second scenario reflects the facts, the firm's recommendation would be ill-founded.
Finally, the firm unjustifiably relies on the studies that correlate coffee and cola consumption with age. The firm does not provide evidence to confirm the reliability of the studies. Moreover, while the phrase STUDIES SUGGEST may appear to lend credibility to these claims, the phrase is vague enough to actually render the claims worthless in the absence of any information about them.
In conclusion, the firm should not transfer investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee merely on the basis of this argument. To better evaluate the recommendation, we would need more information about the study upon which it relies. We would also need more detailed projections of population trends during the next 20 years.